add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube

Comments (Continued)

  • 43 months ago
  • 1 point

No RAID 0, do not know enough about it to experiment. and if im honest any risk is still risk. wouldn't go for it, the reason for is one for OS and programs 1 for games I play the most.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

I suspected that being the case. :)

Still, I would have gone fore a cheaper solution: a single but larger capacity SSD partitioned for OS volume and Games volume.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

To be honest mate these SSD's where actually a steal. cheap considering what is out there.

  • 42 months ago
  • 1 point

That's fine, it's a great build. No argument about that. All I said, that I personally would have gone for a single drive instead.

Sort

add arrow-down arrow-left arrow-right arrow-up authorcheckmark clipboard combo comment delete discord dots drag-handle dropdown-arrow errorfacebook history inbox instagram issuelink lock markup-bbcode markup-html markup-pcpp markup-cyclingbuilder markup-plain-text markup-reddit menu pin radio-button save search settings share star-empty star-full star-half switch successtag twitch twitter user warningwattage weight youtube